🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to resume atomic talks with the United States on condition that it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has announced.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations produced results, and shared fresh requests had originated from intermediaries to resume talks with the American leadership. He said Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Iran had not yet reached a point to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Navigating a Challenging Route

The foreign minister is walking a complex course since Iran wishes not to appear to be operating from a situation of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged more powerful in military terms and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will never give up" – the main reason of the impasse in the previous talks.

Earlier Discussions Unexpectedly Ended

The earlier sessions of discussions between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that concluded with Donald Trump declaring the facilities had been destroyed. Following this, Western states used their privilege to restore global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that American atomic experts could function within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Representatives asserted repeatedly they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Position

Iranian officials said the consortium offer was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be reintroduced in various formats if negotiations reopen.

Trump in recent days claimed he had been getting signals that Iran desired to restart talks, but in private Iranian officials state they are not yet getting consistent overtures from the United States either directly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of inactivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran says negotiations is not part of a show.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his speech to the gathering, aimed to depict the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the concept of international law, Araghchi declared the two-week conflict revealed the conflict could not be ended by combat operations. He stated the assaults started with a US demand for an total Iran submission and concluded with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with total Washington understanding and cooperation, making trust challenging to rebuild.

Negotiations Stays the Ultimate Answer

The foreign minister declared: "It was not Iran that had abandoned negotiations; it was the United States and the European states that had always tried to impose their desires during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be alive and continues the primary resolution to settle conflicts, but its standards, regulations and tenets must be adhered to."

"If they talk to the nation of Iran with the approach of respect and honor, they will obtain a reply in the equivalent approach."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the struggle of repair and reconstruction, Araghchi stated he was certain Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We acquired many lessons from this war; we have identified our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He added: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to obliterate, stays intact. The facilities and machinery, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but failed to break. The Iranian people have become more resilient, more cohesive, and more backing of the government and the nation in the wake of this assault."