🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear the manager was able to withstand losing against lower-league opposition. Survive losing a crucial European final versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood losing at home against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, laying waste to some of the club’s best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to tango. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight right-back during Blackburn Rovers' championship 1994-95 season, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have missed. The most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed his squad for failing in individual battles succumbing when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole painful saga appears to portray the director in a different perspective. It may have been easy, given his nine months of experience at Southampton, to regard Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary within the club's structure: a man whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which the club's mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

A Strategic Clash Regarding System & Ideology

For example, it was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the hierarchy that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these pleas were resisted. However, these judgements hold greater authority when issued from the mouth of a man the unimpeachable soccer background he possesses, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time he might agree to explain his thought processes publicly. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause activated. The director seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – men like him – function on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, probably we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite the same as being ready to receive.

The Supreme Power Behind Command

Naturally, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to adopt data science and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach to football “shall be decided in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply superior. Whom else could one trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that looks similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Soccer Order: Directors Above Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier football. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and drive to go into a club and see their vision supported to fruition. But how many companies have such individuals established? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the strategy in the boardroom and appoint someone who can tailor their offering accordingly. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not creating the food, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance in action: the elevation of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Appoint the system coach and then dismiss them for using too much 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and then discard him for taking too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.